Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
63-летняя Деми Мур вышла в свет с неожиданной стрижкой17:54。关于这个话题，heLLoword翻译官方下载提供了深入分析
前NBA球員恩尼斯·坎特·弗里德姆（Enes Kanter Freedom）稱她為「叛徒」，並指其「生於美國、長於美國、居於美國，卻選擇為全球最惡劣的人權侵犯者——中國——對抗自己的國家」。，这一点在safew官方版本下载中也有详细论述
第二十七条 居民会议应当有全体十八周岁以上的本社区居民或者户的代表的过半数参加。居民会议所作决定，应当经到会人员的过半数通过。